Archive for 2010

What does it cost us to produce this product?

Wednesday, December 15th, 2010 | Posted by Scott Crittenden in Blog

Business people with question mark on boards

Sound familiar?  This question is asked countless times by a variety of people inside a business – operations accounting, plant accounting, sales and marketing, and even research and development.  In most cases the answer is given as one general cost number derived from a universal standard rate and unit of measure within the business.  My clients with complex manufacturing processes would tell you that before they can answer this question, they need to ask you a few questions.

Where was it produced?
What plant or what line was the item produced?  Different plant and line specific costs can exist when producing the same product.

When was it produced?
Was it part of a full production run, or a small specialty order?
When did it hit inventory?  And, is there an aging cost or a layered cost as part of the total cost?

What raw material price was used?  And, is it at standard or actual?
Did we use sales price, market price, or some average price to value the raw material?

What accounting methodology or logic is being used to calculate cost?
Does your company use a frozen yearly standard, running three-month actual, up to date current yearly standard, fully absorbed at current capacity, fully absorbed at standard capacity, or some other accounting methodology?

Answering these questions is simplified when you use an enterprise costing system like ImpactECS that allows multiple sets of cost to exist simultaneously for the same finished SKU.  Process manufacturing companies need to analyze their costs from multiple perspectives, and visibility to trustworthy costing data before you implement a change gives you the ability to make sound business decisions.

Most manufacturing companies today are challenged with multiple production environments and complex manufacturing processes.  This often means that one cost per product is not sufficient for the kind of detailed cost analysis needed to compete successfully.  By developing a costing process that includes an enterprise-level costing solution, you’ll have the tools to answer all of these questions and more. 

Share |

Top Eight Warning Signs You Have a Dysfunctional Costing System – Part 1

Thursday, December 9th, 2010 | Posted by Stacey Adams in Blog

Oops! Road Sign

Last week I was sitting at my desk trying to think of a blog topic, and the ideas were coming slowly.  Since our team has started blogging, my usual well of ideas has dried up because everyone’s saving their best ideas for their own articles. Then out of nowhere, our newest application specialist, Bhavin, decided to pop in to tell me about an interesting book he’d just finished by Lianabel Oliver called Designing Strategic Cost Systems: How to Unleash the Power of Cost Information.  After I read the section he shared on dysfunctional cost systems, I knew I had some valuable information that could help manufacturing companies understand the problems inside their costing process.

The book talks about the eight internal warning signs that indicate your costing system is dysfunctional.  In part one of this blog, I’ll discuss the first four signs and what companies need to consider when designing their costing processes.

 #1 – Financial reports are inaccurate or don’t reflect business operations

Call it a sixth sense, intuition or ESP, but business leaders know how their businesses operate.  Plant managers know how swapping raw material inputs or changing to a different production line will impact costs of a product.  And when they see reports that don’t line up with those expectations, they tend to distrust the results and ultimately stop relying on the data.  To gain acceptance, cost accountants need to take an in-depth look at both their operations and accounting processes to develop a system that is true to their manufacturing process and accounting methodologies.

 #2 – Managers are unable to explain financial results

The best way to verify if you know something is to teach it to someone else. Accountants who cannot give a simple explanation to their financial results from a business perspective have no idea what the results mean.  It’s easy to hide behind explaining the logic and never tying it back to the actual business. But for managers to clearly relate the results to the business, an alignment between the cost system and the business process it represents is fundamental.

 #3 – Managers don’t use financial reports

Oliver discusses four reasons that managers don’t use reports: (1) the reports are too late; (2) the information is stale; (3) the reported costs don’t reflect the true costs of the operation, and (4) they are too difficult to understand.  For costing to become an essential component of decision-making for any organization, the costing system must make up-to-date costing information available from a straightforward interface.  They need the ability to build reports that capture the information important to the organization in a format that is both digestible and actionable.

#4 – Managers develop their own cost models

If the operations team doesn’t buy in to the costing methodology, they will build their own offline costing models to support their decision-making process.  Ultimately, having multiple costing processes existing inside one company can only lead to confusion and negatively affect the company’s profitability.  Gaining agreement from the users and customers of cost data within the organization on the costing methodology is a critical step in implementing any costing system.

Fortunately for you (and me!), my next blog is already underway. Stay tuned for part two where I’ll cover the second four signs that could mean your cost system is dysfunctional.  

Update:  Read Part 2 of this blog series to read about the final four warning signs.

Want to make sure you don’t miss part two?  Subscribe to our RSS feed and you’ll receive instant notifications when we post new articles to our blog.

Share |

Best Business Books 2010 from strategy+business

Friday, December 3rd, 2010 | Posted by Stacey Adams in Blog
Illustration by Daniel Pelavin

Illustration by Daniel Pelavin

Looking for stocking stuffers for the business person in your life!  This year’s list of the top business books from strategy+business magazine is available just in time for your holiday shopping. You can find titles in a wide range of business categories including human capital, the economy, innovation, management, and leadership.

See the entire list on the s+b website at http://www.strategy-business.com/article/10409.

Share |

Movin’ on up…

Monday, November 29th, 2010 | Posted by Stacey Adams in Blog

Outside 1765 The ExchangeAfter more than 10 years on Parkwood Circle, 3C Software is movin’ on up – to our own corporate campus.  That’s right, we’ve purchased a great building where our sales team can sell more, our consultants can consult more, our developers can develop more… you get the idea!

Last week we took our first visit as a team to the new building to check out the space. Watch this short video from Jennifer Smith, our building project manager, to hear a bit more about the new location.

WATCH VIDEO

We’ll follow her progress over the months giving you a behind-the-scenes look at our own extreme building makeover.

Share |

It’s the Cost!!!

Thursday, November 18th, 2010 | Posted by Matthew Smith in Blog

Make yourself heard

Today I met with finance and operations managers for a manufacturing company that didn’t really understand the unique costs of each product they produce.  As a result, they weren’t really sure of the margins being created by each product and customer they serve.  The interesting part was that these very same managers were pondering whether they could afford to invest in a costing system.  As I listened I couldn’t help but wonder, “How can you NOT afford to invest in a costing system?  Doesn’t everyone know that a true and accurate understanding of your product costs is paramount to the success of a competitive, commodity business? “   

As the meeting continued, topics like capacity utilization, fixed cost absorption, and the need to produce forecasted costs based on future period sales forecasts and radically changing raw material prices came up.  The voice inside my head yelled, “How can you NOT afford to invest in a costing system?” Admittedly and shamefully adopted from the political arena, I too often find my inner cost accountant shouting IT’S THE COST STUPID!, and right then I knew the name of my blog. 

At the heart of any successful commodity-goods manufacturer is a cost-focused culture that understands and embraces this mantra.  In these challenging economic times – arguably more so than in better times – a full understanding of the true and accurate costs incurred at the unique product level are of utmost importance. In fact, this data truly creates a competitive advantage in the market place.  True and accurate costing data that allows me to decide where best to produce my products, which of my production lines to set idle, which orders and price points to accept and which to reject, gives me an advantage over a producer that doesn’t share the same level of cost insight.  Without this insight my seemingly correct answers to these questions could lead me in the exact wrong direction.  A seasoned cost accountant once told me, “There is much truth in detailed, accurate cost data”.  Perhaps it is this truth that many business leaders are afraid to face!

As I wrapped up today’s meeting and we parted company, my gracious hosts shared with me proudly their plans for an upcoming ERP upgrade project that was scheduled to take two years to complete.  We wondered together whether they should work towards understanding their product costs now or wait until after the ERP project.  Arghhhh….  Say it with me…  IT’S THE COST!

Share |