Posts Tagged ‘Budgeting and Planning’

More about budgets…

Monday, October 15th, 2012 | Posted by Stacey Adams in Blog

Last month we highlighted the CFO magazine article “Freed from the Budget”, where companies discussed how they have eliminated the budget process from their companies all together.  As expected, this controversial topic drew lots of opinions from finance and accounting leaders.  What they learned was that many of the challenges to having an effective budgeting process had less to do with budgeting issues and more to do with the tools and techniques required to actually develop the budget.

One reader, Miles Ewing – Deloitte Consulting Principal, shared his ideas of how to develop an effective financial performance management process:

  • Align process to purpose
  • Separate target-setting from budgeting
  • Have a process to redirect funding
  • Develop contingency plans

Do you have other ideas on how to make budgeting work for your organization?

Share |

Budgets – Are they a thing of the past?

Thursday, September 6th, 2012 | Posted by Stacey Adams in Blog

According to a recent article in CFO Magazine, companies are embracing the idea of eliminating one of their most time-consuming and hated processes – developing a corporate budget. “Freed from the Budget” discusses companies of all sizes and industries that have eliminated their budgeting practice in hopes of finding a better way to run their businesses.  Much of the discussion revolves around the ideas extolled by Steve Player, managing director of the Beyond Budget Roundtable (BBRT) – a group of corporate finance leaders that share ideas on performance management.

As part of  BBRT’s message about the problems with budgeting, they’ve developed a list of 10 Reasons for Replacing the Budget:

1. Budgeting prevents rapid response to unpredictable events.

2. Budgeting is too detailed and expensive, absorbing around 20% of management time.

3. Budgeting is out of date within a few months.  Key assumptions change frequently, causing confusion and rework.

4. Budgeting is out of kilter with the competitive environment.

5. Budgeting is divorced from strategy.  Budgets are based on functions and departments rather than strategic themes.

6. Budgeting stifled initiative and innovation.

7. Budgeting protects non-value-adding costs.  Cost budgets are usually compiled and agreed on based on prior-year outcomes.

8. Budgeting reinforces command-and-control.  Budgets were designed to enable functional leaders to manage the organization from the center.

9. Budgeting demotivated people.

10. Budgeting encourages unethical behavior and increases reputational risks.  Aggressive targets and incentives drive people to meet the numbers at almost any cost.

While the article highlights a handful of companies, most are wary to eliminate this essential business task.  So, what do you think – are budgets a thing of the past, or do they have a relevant place in an organization?

Share |

Are budgets obsolete?

Friday, May 6th, 2011 | Posted by Stacey Adams in Blog

There isn’t a day that goes by that we don’t talk about budgeting with our customers and prospects.  And as you would expect, every one of those companies has a different perspectives on the importance of budgets and how to effectively manage them.  In CFO Magazine, Russ Banham’s article Let It Roll challenges the effectiveness of budgeting and shares how many companies are moving to rolling forecasts to make business decisions.

Over the past year, we’ve found that manufacturers are increasingly concerned with improving their forecasting and analysis capabilities.   While calculating accurate product costs is the foundation of most of our implementations, giving companies the ability to analyze scenarios inside their cost system expands their ability to see the real impact of changing market conditions, customer demand, and manufacturing processes have on the bottom line.  The recent study, “The CFO Agenda: Finance’s Top Issues in 2011”, from The Hackett Group supports that fact by reporting that 81% of CFOs are focused on improving the accuracy, cycle times and efficiency of their forecasting process.

We’d love to hear from you whether budgets are obsolete in your business.  Chime in on our blog and let us know what you think.

Share |

Top Eight Warning Signs You Have a Dysfunctional Costing System – Part 2

Tuesday, January 4th, 2011 | Posted by Stacey Adams in Blog

Broken screen of computer

The book Designing Strategic Cost Systems: How to Unleash the Power of Cost Information by Lianbel Oliver has a great list of warning signs that may indicate that your company’s costing system is dysfunctional.  Make sure you check out Part 1 of this blog where I covered the first four signs.  And without further ado, here’s the rest…

#5 – Managers Don’t Understand Product Profitability

Products that are manufactured at high volumes generally have predictable cost results.  Why?  Because they’re manufactured regularly, operations folks are familiar with the processes and require less ramp-up time to produce the goods.  But for some lower volume products, calculating the product cost can become a bit of a mystery.  While the labor and materials required is the same for both high and low volume products, a product that is produced infrequently includes a learning curve that can ultimately increase the cost of the product.  This additional cost may not be captured, thereby skewing the results and leading business leaders to make incorrect decisions on topics including about product mix, pricing, and customers.

#6 – Accountants Spend Too Much Time on Special Requests for Analysis

If accountants feel like they’re recreating the wheel each time product cost information is requested – Houston, we have a problem!  The basic cost information needs of the organization should be readily available through the system allowing cost accountants to focus their efforts on true analysis needed to improve business performance.

#7 – Inconsistencies in Reported Data

Manufacturing companies know all too well that financial accounting and cost accounting are two separate animals with unique purpose.  Even with the difference, the core data used for each function should come from the same source.  The number of units produced or transactions processed in the costing system should match those in the general ledger.  Tight integration of costing, finance and operations systems is required to eliminate problems with inconsistent data.

#8 – Managers Make Suboptimal Decisions

Ever heard the idiom “Robbing Peter to pay Paul”?  Many times costing processes are designed to make decisions that are not in the best interest of the organization.  One example from the book talks about a manager who inflates standards to meet performance levels without understanding how this decision could adversely impact marketing or pricing.  The costing system should help all parts of the business run optimally and help managers make decisions that promote the company’s overall profitability.

We’re hard at work creating cost management content that is interesting to our readers.  Subscribe to our RSS feed and you’ll receive instant notifications when we post new articles.

Share |

Top Eight Warning Signs You Have a Dysfunctional Costing System – Part 1

Thursday, December 9th, 2010 | Posted by Stacey Adams in Blog

Oops! Road Sign

Last week I was sitting at my desk trying to think of a blog topic, and the ideas were coming slowly.  Since our team has started blogging, my usual well of ideas has dried up because everyone’s saving their best ideas for their own articles. Then out of nowhere, our newest application specialist, Bhavin, decided to pop in to tell me about an interesting book he’d just finished by Lianabel Oliver called Designing Strategic Cost Systems: How to Unleash the Power of Cost Information.  After I read the section he shared on dysfunctional cost systems, I knew I had some valuable information that could help manufacturing companies understand the problems inside their costing process.

The book talks about the eight internal warning signs that indicate your costing system is dysfunctional.  In part one of this blog, I’ll discuss the first four signs and what companies need to consider when designing their costing processes.

 #1 – Financial reports are inaccurate or don’t reflect business operations

Call it a sixth sense, intuition or ESP, but business leaders know how their businesses operate.  Plant managers know how swapping raw material inputs or changing to a different production line will impact costs of a product.  And when they see reports that don’t line up with those expectations, they tend to distrust the results and ultimately stop relying on the data.  To gain acceptance, cost accountants need to take an in-depth look at both their operations and accounting processes to develop a system that is true to their manufacturing process and accounting methodologies.

 #2 – Managers are unable to explain financial results

The best way to verify if you know something is to teach it to someone else. Accountants who cannot give a simple explanation to their financial results from a business perspective have no idea what the results mean.  It’s easy to hide behind explaining the logic and never tying it back to the actual business. But for managers to clearly relate the results to the business, an alignment between the cost system and the business process it represents is fundamental.

 #3 – Managers don’t use financial reports

Oliver discusses four reasons that managers don’t use reports: (1) the reports are too late; (2) the information is stale; (3) the reported costs don’t reflect the true costs of the operation, and (4) they are too difficult to understand.  For costing to become an essential component of decision-making for any organization, the costing system must make up-to-date costing information available from a straightforward interface.  They need the ability to build reports that capture the information important to the organization in a format that is both digestible and actionable.

#4 – Managers develop their own cost models

If the operations team doesn’t buy in to the costing methodology, they will build their own offline costing models to support their decision-making process.  Ultimately, having multiple costing processes existing inside one company can only lead to confusion and negatively affect the company’s profitability.  Gaining agreement from the users and customers of cost data within the organization on the costing methodology is a critical step in implementing any costing system.

Fortunately for you (and me!), my next blog is already underway. Stay tuned for part two where I’ll cover the second four signs that could mean your cost system is dysfunctional.  

Update:  Read Part 2 of this blog series to read about the final four warning signs.

Want to make sure you don’t miss part two?  Subscribe to our RSS feed and you’ll receive instant notifications when we post new articles to our blog.

Share |