Archive for 2010

Don’t Force Your Managerial Accounting Process into a Transactional System

Friday, November 12th, 2010 | Posted by Andy Bigalow in Blog

Square Peg in a Round Hole_0565

I have spent the majority of my technology career in the Manufacturing Computer Systems space and have been most impressed with how the world of technology has improved our ability to automate our business transactions.  MRP solutions morphed into ERP solutions.  The ability for a company to design, order, buy, build, ship, invoice and produce a financial statement reflecting their business during a given period of time has provided tremendous gains in not only the transactions costs of doing business, but the ability to manage that information in large quantities.  Multi-country, multi-language, multi-plant, multi-tax code, multi-currency, multi-multi-multi has been a godsend for those large international manufacturing companies.  The likes of SAP, Oracle and others have provided the transactional information essential for running a complex organization.

These systems do a great job of building a standard cost for a product or SKU.  This cost is needed to build a cost-of-goods sold and provide the basis for financial reporting.  However, where these transactional processing ERP systems fall short, is the ability to provide detailed managerial cost accounting information and flexibility.  These systems were not set up to track simultaneous multiple costs for the same SKU and easily manage these different cost attributes by plant, by process, by date, by material substitution, by shift, by packaging etc.  Only a standard cost and current cost are easily handled.  Building rates inside the factory at the machine, work-center and department levels don’t exist.

By using ERP systems for process manufacturing costing processes is often like forcing a square peg into a round hole. The detailed cost data they need to track is splintered away and they’re forced to use a spreadsheet or build a database program to handle the analysis.  I had one controller tell me that his company had “blown up” several computers trying to replicate their costing processes in a spreadsheet.  Process manufacturing companies must become aware that there is an alternative solution of managerial cost accounting that resides in complete harmony with the traditional transaction ERP systems.

Share |

Welcome Baby Levi

Thursday, November 11th, 2010 | Posted by Stacey Adams in Blog
Levi

Levi

 

Our energetic Inside Sales Associate Eric, and his lovely wife LaPrecious, welcomed Levi Ellis into the world on Sunday.  This adorable bundle of joy weighed in at 7lbs, 8oz and 19.75 inches.  Congrats to Mom, Dad and big brothers Noel and Emmanuel.

Share |

Welcome Bhavin Pathak to our Professional Services team!

Wednesday, November 10th, 2010 | Posted by Stacey Adams in Blog
Vin Pathak
Vin Pathak

We’re excited to introduce the newest member of the 3C Software team. This week Bhavin (Vin) Pathak joins our professional services group as an Application Specialist.

Vin holds Bachelors Degrees in Accounting and Law as well as an MBA with an emphasis in financial management from Gujarat University in India. In addition, his work experience as an SAP implementation consultant makes him a great asset to our company and clients.

In his spare time, Vin loves to travel and has travelled extensively across India and parts of Asia. He’s also an avid mountaineer and has climbed to more than 18,000 feet in the Himalayas. He lives in the northern suburbs with his wife and daughter and is looking forward to relocating somewhere in Atlanta that won’t require him to commute through Spaghetti Junction.

We’re still growing our professional services team.  So, if you want to be like Bhavin, check out our job postings on the Careers page for information about our open entry-level and senior application specialists positions.

Share |

Black Boxes: Great for Airplanes, Terrible for Forecasting

Wednesday, November 3rd, 2010 | Posted by Stacey Adams in Blog

BlackBox_Blog_SAdams_110310_11636884
We’ve all heard of black boxes on airplanes that track critical flight data. Without discrimination, the black box records everything that is happening in the cockpit and on the aircraft. And in the event of an emergency, it’s up to the accident investigators to decipher the recorded data and put the pieces together to determine a cause.

I just finished reading “Cleaning the Crystal Ball” where the authors discussed the concept of the black box as it relates to forecasting business results. Just like the airplane, many business models have become black boxes that capture information indiscriminately and generate results without providing the users an explanation of the underlying drivers and assumptions. The role of the business leader shifts from captain to accident investigator where he is tasked with making sense of the results, often when it’s too late to make adjustments.

With transparent models, business leaders regain the captain’s seat because they recognize and react to the changing environment as it happens. They become proactive instead of imprudent as their confidence in the model’s results grows. And, they reduce the number of catastrophic decisions that could lead to disastrous business results.

For product costing in process manufacturing industries, a transparent model must provide both detailed data and straightforward logic. With multiple work-in-process points, complex parent-child relationships, expansive bills-of-materials, and large catalogs of finished goods, the user must be able to navigate through and drill into the model to expose the underlying factors that contribute to a particular result. The ability to peel back the layers eliminates the “black box” syndrome because the user can identify how the results came to be. Furthermore, by ensuring that the logic behind the model lines up with the company’s existing business practices, confidence in the model is bolstered and business leaders are less likely to “go with the gut.”

So when you’re building a product cost model, forget the old joke that says “Why don’t they build the airplane out of the same stuff they use to build the black box?” Instead, look for a modeling tool that helps you build a transparent, user-centric solution that makes sense for your business.

Share |

What’s more important, standard costs or actual costs?

Wednesday, October 6th, 2010 | Posted by Stacey Adams in Blog

Professors Jennifer Dosch, CMA and Joel Wilson, CPA, recently published an article in Strategic Finance Magazine discussing the differences between textbook and real-life product costing for manufacturers. They took a look at three consumer packaged goods manufacturers to undercover the methodologies used to calculate product costs.

“Based on our analysis of three companies that differ significantly in size, the industry practice of process costing focuses considerable effort on developing accurate standard input costs and volumes to help manage business operations efficiently and effectively.”

Read the entire article here: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6421/is_2_92/ai_n55049110/?tag=content;col1

For many ImpactECS customers, calculating both standard and actual costs are an important part of their overall costing process. Is there a focus in your organization on one cost over the other, or are they equally important in driving decisions for your company?

Share |